I think I'd be more wary of a person that loves cats. They are kind of evil, you know, and only a slightly untrustworthy person would love something that is evil.
I think I'd be more wary of a person that loves cats. They are kind of evil, you know, and only a slightly untrustworthy person would love something that is evil.
I think I'd be more wary of a person that loves cats. They are kind of evil, you know, and only a slightly untrustworthy person would love something that is evil.
13) a journey of 1,000 miles begins with a single step
:O Cats are not evil. Rather, they are just extremely selfish and self-centred. Despite this, you do not see them oppressing others. It is the human's own will to submit to wishes of something so cute and furry which allows the cat to control the human.
Laugh at yourself. Don't take yourself completely seriously. I think it's a quality people should try to hold on to.
- The strong and the rich have a moral obligation to protect the poor and the weak
...
- Look out for the overlooked, the misunderstood, the forgotten and the unpopular
Oh and if there is one thing that I truly value - it's basic consideration and courtesy to other people.
But the poor and the weak also have an obligation not to stay that way and continue to leech off the rich and the strong greedily.
Sometimes the unpopular and the misunderstood are the way they are because they are simply being unpleasant. Hobos for one. Always begging for money only to spend it on useless things. As for the misunderstood, you can't always give in to them just because you don't want them to feel bad.
But otherwise, I agree that you should treat others with courtesy and politeness, no matter what situation they're in.
While it's true all people should try to help themselves - and the lack of doing so is dismempowering - the fact remains that there will always be people who are will be poor or weaker than others - not everyone is going to have the same strength or resiliency. Most of us like to think that just because we are smart enough to be in a position where a situation like that is unlikely to happen to us ourselves, we can dismiss and make excuses. There is more than meets the eye when it comes to poverty - and by nature of a system where there are haves and have nots - there will always be financial inequality - which is why substantial (not formal) equality should be something all of us strive towards. By right of being born into this world - we (at least we should) have enough insight to look after one another.
There is always a reason for the way people are - most of us don't want to take the time to understand why, or find it difficult to see things from anothers perspective (especially from the less well off) - a convenient excuse to make laden heavy judgements like hobos begging for money to buy useless things.
Yes I agree that we should look after one another. But you can also choose who you want to expend your resources and energy on. Some people just happen to deserve it more than others. Do you feel your help would really benefit them in the long term? Do you think you'll have made a big enough impact for them to look on towards the future with stronger shoulders to hold their burden on?
Giving money to homeless people isn't about benefiting them in the long term or making a big enough impact for them to look on towards the future with stronger shoulders to hold their burden on, giving money to homeless people is what you do to make their lives that bit easier obviously giving homeless people isn't going to change their lives but it will still help them. Also no poor people in Belfast spend their money on useless things it is the middle classes whp spend all their money on themselves.
Yes I agree that we should look after one another. But you can also choose who you want to expend your resources and energy on. Some people just happen to deserve it more than others. Do you feel your help would really benefit them in the long term? Do you think you'll have made a big enough impact for them to look on towards the future with stronger shoulders to hold their burden on?
The 'excuses' are there so that we don't inefficiently waste our time pitying or sympathising with such individuals. Understanding or seeing a person's perspective is one thing, taking action is another. If you really care about the situation the hobos are in (again I'm only using them as an example) then you would do something to really help them. Sympathy is not enough.
The trouble I have with these kinds of attitudes is the implication that some people simply arent worthwhile and the belief that somehow it couldn't possibly happen to you. If YOU were in that situation, if YOU were ignored and not cared about how would you feel? It's easy for so many of us to sit there, behind our computers, with our literacy and cognitive functioning and our understanding of the world and the little bubble we live in, and express sentiments such as some people deserve more than others - because we just cant imagine things being any-other-way. It's just too difficult to comprehend. We expect so much from others - but we are so unwilling to extend that same expectation for ourselves *to* others, as soon as our needs are met, who cares about anyone elses? - this is extremely frustrating to me.
If I was in that situation, alone, and I was ignored and not cared about, I would think I deserved it because I f**ked up.